Madfles+vs.+Cinderemy+-+Marie+Sheehan

1AC—Time left over= 1:45 1AR—Really good time allocation. Also I like how you phrase concessions on the case flows as solvency deficits to the alternative. The two things that were underexplained was the double bind on the k, and the impact turn on the China DA. I didn’t get any warranted explanation on those parts of the flow especially on the DA flow.
 * Puffles**

2AC—good impact extension on the leadership and stability flows but when doing line by line on the I-law flow you are extending card tags but no warrants. You end the speech with 2:30 left and practically drop politics. I think that even though they didn’t impact politics in the 1NC you can’t just dismiss it because they could always read the impacts in the block so you should use your time to preempt them or make other answers on the flow. 2AR—you do good line-by-line on the DA flow but I think you should have an overview where you clearly explain your impacts and do impact comparison. You have time to do this because you have 1:30 left of your speech.
 * Maddie**

CX—Ask less “can you repeat this” questions and try and ask more questions about the aff itself, also you don’t just have to let Puffles talk, you can interrupt her to ask your next question 1NC—You have 2 minutes left over, I would recommend either impacting your politics DA, or reading defense on all three advantages. 1NR—When you want to extend cards on the DA don’t just say “extend uniqueness” you should explain why you are unique, and why they link. You do a good job explaining the DA and doing impact analysis but you should do this as an overview instead of as an underview. Block Comments: The politics DA should have been there.
 * Jeremy**

2NR-- you should have defense on both advantages to mitigate the offense they can get from the 1AC and make your DA outweighs the case story more convincing. Think about different 2NR possibilities when putting your 1NC together. Also good overview—but when you are explaining your impacts you shouldn’t just use buzz words like “timeframe” and “magnitude” instead you should explain why your impact happen first or are bigger, and extend cards and warrants to explain why that is true.
 * Cindy**

2NC—You start to do some good explanation of the cap k at the bottom of the speech put that at the top of the cap k flow instead of at the end of the speech, it is easier to flow and clearer. Also you seem to have to right idea of where to go to answer the args the 2AC makes but you should say “they say X, our answer is Y”, that would make you easier to flow. Also when you are going to make the K most of your 2NC, and their main answer to the k is the permutation you should make the link debate more of a focus, and do some explanation of the links in the context of the 1AC, you should also make sure to extend and explain the alt. You did good impact work on the K. On the case flow to extend cards you don’t have to reread the tag or the card instead you can extend the claim and the warrant of the card, and you should make sure to extend warrants that answer the answers they made in the 2AC to your case arguments.