Ayana+vs.+Blaizin+-+Thorn

2AC (Tiana) - You need more diverse arguments on the cap K to create uniqueness for your link turns. Shouldn't scratch the no-alt and cap=sustainable cards. Read the gibson-graham evidence.

2NC (Blaize) - Localize your overviews. E.g. read your "links" not at the top but on their link arguments in the line by line. Make your impact arguments comparative. Use THEIR words (from the 1AC) rather than YOUR words to describe the links to the K. E.g. quote their cards. Make alt solves case arguments.

1NR (Yassin) - Specify the impacts on China disad. It's not necessarily US-China war but US-China cooperation good.

1AR (Ayan) - Answer their "you cover over the system" link. The K ignores Latin America argument is interesting, but it you need to develop it more.

2NR - The "new 1AR args" argument is too lenient. (1) tell the judge which arguments are new in 1AR, and (2) tell me to ignore the new 1AR arguments because accepting new args in the rebuttal encourages sandbagging (saving the best arguments for later in the debate) and eliminates clash. Timeframe is not the best impact comparison arg for the K. Your impact comparisons need to be comparative.

2AR- You should go for the perm and/or the alt doesn't solve arguments to help your link turns. Right now your link turns are frustrated by the fact that the alt solves for the K, so any risk of a link to the plan would mean it's comparatively better. Here's the time when you want to stress your AFF impacts (esp. since they don't try to make inroads into case via the alt) and how specific they are opposed to the kritik.