A-Jared+vs.+Nadiana+-+Madeline+Hage

In general this debate could have been neater. Everyone should work on line by line and making it clear what arguments you're answering. Specifically, the case debate was pretty messy. We got close to having some better debate in the 1NR but arguments were dropped in every speech. Be sure you're flowing really carefully so when arguments are dropped you bring them up and also so you don't drop arguments. 1A and 2A--A.J. --Good job being clear in the 1AC! --Take 1NC cx questions further and make a point out of each question. --try to prepare some questions --They didn't really concede solvency it was just contested on other flows. No need to read cards on this. --you did some overview in the middle of the flow on the advantages, that should be at the top and everything should be done in order. --don't need to say you're reading an add on. that should be more sneaky on the flow. I would just read a bunch of those on cps and like random places on the flow where they made weird defensive arguments. --should go through case really quickly in 2AC, cover just enough and spend more time on the off case. those are what will really hurt you later inthe debate. --should order the 2AC in a specific way. put most threatening on top and less threating das and stuff on bottom. --Need to go to framework in the 1AR even though the k was dropped. you shouls still try to justify you epistemology. Don't drop any links on the K i.e. the heg link -frame the debate at the top of the 2AR say 'key framing issue' or tell the judge how they should view the debate and subsequently the rest of your speech --I don't know if ilaw was the best way to try to beat the k.

1N-- Dana --good job being fast and clear! that's really good for a 1N --make it really clear what argumetns your answering on politics especially. --you should have an overview on politics where you turn all of their impacts and put little tricks like rollback. you had the turns case but those should be at the top. 2N--Nadia --CX of 1AC--don't give the 1A to rant about why the plan is good i.e. asking "how does the plan cause economic growth" --fill up the 1NC, maybe put another off --should make sure you have strong links that are explained to every adv and aff scenario just so they can't sneak out of the k. but like yeah it was dropped so that probably isn't as important in this round. --you say "sorry' when you're thinking of what to say. just work on doing that --you should specifically say that you're putting an overview at thetop of the da just so it's clear --Try to be more clear about what arguments you're answering in the 2NC. The 2NC was a little jumpy so be sure you're answering the arguments in order and being clear about that! --you gave the 1nr too much especially since you had time left over. you should have probably taken a few case flows. --you probably don't need to go onto case and do extensions there, the k should just turn case and that should be where you do the in depth analysis. Extended some conflicting cards--US has no influence in latin america (would maybe take out the spillover of the k?) --should put overview on top of k. you did "this is how to evaluate the round" later but that should be before at the top. Write the ballot for me. --should put concessions and big things at the top i.e. framework and how to frame the debate and how i should look at it.