Puffyaan+vs+Rublaize+-+Baxter

Puffles—first question that is asked has to be one that you don’t turn over to the Ayaan—you sound realy down asking questions of the 1NC—let Ayaan answer the questions in the 2AC—gotta start the 1AR not on that speed—good reading of the book stuff, make that included on the framework flow—case is a straight turn to this speaking for others argument right? Put that shit together on the idea of linking our epistemologies—confidence will go MILES for you in this 1AR—watch out for 1Ar repeitition (we say that, the word “activist”) don’t juts make the debate about Ayaan, make it about the structures of colonization and specific modes of thought—

Blaize—good tone for the 1NC—I think you need to start with a stronger explanation of the link argument—you get much better about a minute into the speech—your analysis of the book is not very good, I think you should be connecting this to the substantive questions of your 1NR arguments—whats the alt to either of these arrguments? Are they just non-ux solvency turns? Are these a viable 2NR strategy? Which others are they talking about? Make these distinctions very clear—

Ayaan—start with fire, offense on the speaking for others argument—explore this gift argument more—get up in this framework business, the block is well structured but u sound bored—force yourself to answer the 2AC questions—finally in the cx of the 2NC you get started here—OMG get pumped up—the arguments in the 2AR overview are excellent, but you are not deliving them to the best of your ability—what does decolonize the revolution mean—can you make use of the drops on the other flows—gotta look at me more in the 2ar—don’t lose the specific examples you had before—what do we do to liberate the oppressed, assata Zapatistas etc

Ruby—you have plenty of time during the 2nc you need to look up and connect with the critic every so often—why are Cuba/Venezuela up for debate as to what they are but USFG is not?—talk about in round education vs. out of round education—try this david foster Wallace framework card—more great tone in the 2NC( Neg should not be winning the ethos battle here)—do you need to kick out of these other arguments?—start with a meta framing question of the debate, you get into the line by line too quickly—falling a little apart at the end of the 2nr, you are becoming defensive, making the debate too much about the question of real world activism and not a better education and limits question—