Charlyn+vs.+Kam+-+Thorn

2AC - Integrate cites into your extensions. Claim/warrant, then "that's the X evidence" On case you can save lots of time by grouping neg arguments, especially the ones that assume the status quo

2NC - A lot of your overview arguments and cards can go onto the line by line. Disad/CP overviews should make comparative claims that can't be made on line by line in response to their arguments -- e.g. comparative solvency claims and/or impact outweighs and turns case claims. Theory on CP should go on the CP flow proper.

1NR - You need a better answer to the multiple worlds argument and the perm on the K. Don't hedge your bets on multiple perms bad. Should put the impact calculation either on top or next to an AFF impact argument, and also explains how it interacts with case impacts.

1AR - Keep the multiple advocacies argument

2NR - Spend more time answering their solvency deficit arguments on the CP

2AR - Since they've conceded case you don't have to go to each flow - instead list your impacts and weigh them against the net benefit right away.

General comments -

On the question of whether the CP links to appeasement, both sides need to cite and analyze the Da link evidence.